Insights

The Leadership Bottleneck Behind India's Manufacturing Expansion

India's manufacturing story is getting larger. Companies are adding capacity, setting up plants in new locations, investing in automation and looking at wider domestic and international markets. What receives less attention is the leadership requirement that comes with this expansion.

A new plant can be built. Machinery can be purchased. Technology can be installed. But finding the right person to run a business, scale an operation, build a team, enter a new market or turn around an underperforming function is not always as straightforward.

That gap becomes very visible when you work on senior hiring.

The candidate pool often looks bigger than it really is

One of the first mistakes organisations make in senior hiring is assuming that a large industry automatically means a large candidate pool.

On paper, there may be hundreds of people carrying titles such as Business Head, Plant Head, Sales Head, Operations Head or Manufacturing Head. Once the actual requirement is examined, that number reduces quickly.

Has the person handled a comparable business size? Did the individual carry real P&L responsibility or work within a much larger structure? Has the candidate managed multiple plants or only one location? What type of customers were handled? Has the person built a business or mainly managed an established one? How large was the team? Has the person worked across geographies? Is relocation practical?

These questions usually tell us much more than the designation written on a CV.

In senior searches, the real market often becomes visible only after this filtering is done. What initially appears to be a broad candidate universe can become quite small once scale, responsibility, sector exposure and mobility are taken into account.

Titles can be misleading

Similar titles can carry very different responsibilities across industrial companies.

A Business Head in one organisation may own the complete P&L, manufacturing, sales and strategy. In another company, the same title may cover only one product line or one geography.

A Plant Head may be running a highly automated facility with complex customer requirements in one company and a considerably smaller operation in another. The same issue arises in sales, procurement, utility, engineering, finance and HR.

This is why beginning a senior search with a designation is often the wrong approach. The better starting point is the business problem.

What exactly does the organisation expect this person to solve over the next three years?

Once that is clear, the market can be mapped around capability, scale and context instead of simply looking for matching titles.

The strongest candidate may come from an adjacent sector

Another constraint companies sometimes impose on themselves is insisting that a senior candidate must come from exactly the same product category.

There are positions where direct industry experience is essential. Product knowledge, customer relationships, regulatory exposure or technical complexity may leave little room for compromise.

At CEO and business-leadership level, however, the question can be different. The organisation may need someone who has already handled scale, built teams, managed complexity and demonstrated an ability to lead a sizeable business.

A practical example from a CEO search

One search that illustrates this well was the appointment of Chandrashekhar Shrotri as CEO of APAR Industries' Cables Business.

Shrotri came from Siemens, where he had held senior regional leadership responsibility across India, ASEAN and Africa. His experience included P&L leadership, manufacturing, sales, product management, R&D transformation and multi-country operations.

He was not coming directly from the cable industry, although his experience was firmly within the broader electrical and power ecosystem.

What mattered in that search was not an exact product-category match. The larger question was whether the candidate had the leadership capability, commercial understanding, operating experience and scale of responsibility required for the role.

The promoters were open to considering that broader fit instead of restricting the search only to people who had spent their careers in cables and conductors.

For me, that search remains a useful example of why senior hiring cannot always begin and end with the question: "Has this person worked in our industry?"

A more useful question is: "Has this person dealt with the scale, complexity and business responsibility that we need?"

That distinction can widen the leadership pool without lowering the quality threshold.

Senior candidates are usually not waiting for a job advertisement

At junior and middle levels, active applications can produce a meaningful pipeline. Senior hiring is different.

Many strong senior candidates are reasonably settled in their current organisations. They may not be looking for a change and may have little reason to respond to a general job advertisement.

Before considering a move, they usually want to understand the business situation. Why is the company hiring? What happened to the previous incumbent? Who will the role report to? How much authority will the person actually have? Is the organisation serious about the mandate? What is the growth plan? Will the family need to relocate?

The employer is assessing the candidate, but the candidate is assessing the employer at exactly the same time.

That changes the nature of the search. Confidentiality, clarity and credibility become much more important than volume-based sourcing.

Geography is becoming part of the leadership problem

Manufacturing expansion into newer industrial locations creates another practical difficulty: attracting senior people to those locations.

At leadership level, relocation is rarely an individual decision.

A candidate may like the role but hesitate because of a spouse's career, children's education, ageing parents or the difference between the current city and the proposed location.

Employers sometimes underestimate this and discuss relocation only after several rounds of interviews. By then, both sides may already have invested considerable time.

Location should be discussed honestly at the beginning of the process, not treated as an offer-stage formality.

Expansion also changes what organisations need from leaders

Manufacturing companies today are dealing with more than additional capacity. Automation, digitalisation, productivity, cost pressure, exports, changing customer expectations and workforce issues are altering what organisations expect from their senior leaders.

This often creates a difficult combination.

Companies want someone who understands the traditional business deeply but can also lead change. The individual may need technical credibility with an operating team, commercial understanding with customers, comfort with technology and enough organisational maturity to manage transformation without destabilising the business.

Finding every one of these qualities in a single candidate is difficult.

This is why leadership specifications need prioritisation. Every mandate has desirable elements. Problems begin when every desirable element is treated as non-negotiable.

Employers can make the search easier before it begins

A surprising number of senior searches become difficult because the organisation enters the candidate market before making some basic decisions internally.

The role may still be evolving. Reporting relationships may be unclear. Compensation may not have been finalised. Different interviewers may have different expectations. The organisation may say it wants an entrepreneurial leader while maintaining a structure that gives the person very little decision-making freedom.

Senior candidates notice these contradictions quickly.

Before beginning a senior search, employers should be clear about:

  • What problem is this person being hired to solve?
  • Which three or four capabilities are genuinely essential?
  • What experience can reasonably be learnt after joining?
  • What authority will the person actually have?
  • What compensation range is realistically available?
  • How flexible is the company on exact industry background?
  • Is relocation genuinely workable for the target talent pool?
  • Who will make the final hiring decision?
  • How quickly can the organisation act once the right candidate is identified?

This preparation does not guarantee an easy search. It does prevent a lot of avoidable difficulty.

Manufacturing growth will require leadership depth, not just leadership hiring

India's manufacturing expansion creates significant opportunity, but leadership cannot be treated as a requirement that begins only when a position becomes vacant.

Companies that are scaling plants, entering new product categories or moving into new markets need to think about leadership pipelines earlier.

That means developing people internally, identifying potential successors, understanding where external talent exists and being realistic about where the market is thin.

The leadership bottleneck is rarely visible when expansion plans are being presented. It becomes visible later, when the organisation needs someone to take responsibility for making those plans work.

Leadership capacity therefore needs to be considered at the same time as manufacturing capacity.

About the author

Harish Sharma is Founder & Principal Consultant at JobsPlan, an executive search firm established in 2005. His work has focused on senior leadership hiring across manufacturing, engineering, power, cables and conductors, industrial automation, chemicals, EPC and related industrial sectors.

For selected examples of JobsPlan's senior leadership search experience, see the Executive & Leadership Search Track Record .

Planning a senior manufacturing or industrial hire?

A useful search starts with clarity on the mandate, the realistic talent pool and the business problem the new leader is expected to solve.

Discuss a Leadership Hiring Requirement
WhatsApp JobsPlan Recruitment Team